Simulate an FCE with a Power Commander?

[sychodan]

Hi all,

no need for me personal couse i have an FCE, but i just had following thoughts:

The major job of an FCE is to keep fueling the engine, while throttle is fully closed.

But when i look at a power commander map i could change the value for 0 throttle.
So when i´m setting a 1 at all zero throttle rpms, couldnt i simulate here an fce?
couse the PowerCommander should then still get fuel into the engine when its set to 1 , or am i completely wrong?

Best regards,
dan

 

[super googan]

Unfortunately that wont work. The computer basically over rides the power commander when it calls for fuel cut no matter what value has been entered in the 0% throttle column. I had the same idea as you a while back but Ivans testing has proven it wont work. The only fix for fuel cut is an FCE or a ECU flash. My 2010 is not effected to severely by fuel cut but it does happen and is slightly annoying, from what I've read on the early bikes it's horrible.


I actually tried values from 5 to 20 in the 0% column because I'm stubborn LOL but it did not cure the fuel cut

 

[Marthy]

Always wonder... anyone try to adjust the TPS so it read 1% when the throttle is close? Might just need to adjust the fueling for idle... I'll try it. The TPS read 0-5 volts and give the input to the ECU that is calibrate to transform that in throttle opening angle. But if you cheat this number?

If you have a PCV you can already know what voltage you need for the TPS to read 1% throttle (TPS calibration page) So if I had to test I will either adjust the TPS to read 1% or make a jumper from the +5V to signal wire so it read a minimum V value.

But I might be all wrong too.

 

[Hellgate]

On my R6 I have about 12 points of fuel added in a 2% TPS from 2,500 to 15,500 rpm range. In a long sweepers that require maintenance throttle it really helps with power transition smoothness.